Beta Phase: Square45 is currently in beta testing. Expect some features or content to be incomplete or missing.
45

Ideal Theory

The study of ideal theory.

Sequence of Expressions

Definition

Definitions

An ideal II of a ring RR is a subring such that for all rRr \in R and xIx \in I, rxIrx \in I and xrIxr \in I.
(For the sake of brevity, some results are stated only for left ideals but are usually also true for right ideals with appropriate notation changes.) - In a ring R, the set R itself forms a two-sided ideal of R called the unit ideal. It is often also denoted by (1)(1) since it is precisely the two-sided ideal generated (see below) by the unity ⁠ 1R1_{R} ⁠. Also, the set {0R}\{0_{R}\} consisting of only the additive identity 0_{R} forms a two-sided ideal called the zero ideal and is denoted by ⁠ (0)(0) ⁠. Every (left, right or two-sided) ideal contains the zero ideal and is contained in the unit ideal. - An (left, right or two-sided) ideal that is not the unit ideal is called a proper ideal (as it is a proper subset). Note: a left ideal a{\mathfrak {a}} is proper if and only if it does not contain a unit element, since if uau\in {\mathfrak {a}} is a unit element, then r=(ru1)uar=(ru^{-1})u\in {\mathfrak {a}} for every ⁠ rRr\in R ⁠. Typically there are plenty of proper ideals. In fact, if R is a skew-field, then (0),(1)(0),(1) are its only ideals and conversely: that is, a nonzero ring R is a skew-field if (0),(1)(0),(1) are the only left (or right) ideals. (Proof: if xx is a nonzero element, then the principal left ideal RxRx (see below) is nonzero and thus Rx=(1)Rx=(1) ; i.e., yx=1yx=1 for some nonzero ⁠ yy ⁠. Likewise, zy=1zy=1 for some nonzero zz . Then z=z(yx)=(zy)x=xz=z(yx)=(zy)x=x .) - The even integers form an ideal in the ring Z\mathbb {Z} of all integers, since the sum of any two even integers is even, and the product of any integer with an even integer is also even; this ideal is usually denoted by ⁠ 2Z2\mathbb {Z} ⁠. More generally, the set of all integers divisible by a fixed integer nn is an ideal denoted ⁠ nZn\mathbb {Z} ⁠. In fact, every non-zero ideal of the ring Z\mathbb {Z} is generated by its smallest positive element, as a consequence of Euclidean division, so Z\mathbb {Z} is a principal ideal domain. - The set of all polynomials with real coefficients that are divisible by the polynomial x2+1x^{2}+1 is an ideal in the ring of all real-coefficient polynomials ⁠ R[x]\mathbb {R} [x] ⁠. - Take a ring RR and positive integer ⁠ nn ⁠. For each ⁠ 1in1\leq i\leq n ⁠, the set of all n×nn\times n matrices with entries in RR whose ii -th row is zero is a right ideal in the ring Mn(R)M_{n}(R) of all n×nn\times n matrices with entries in ⁠ RR ⁠. It is not a left ideal. Similarly, for each ⁠ 1jn1\leq j\leq n ⁠, the set of all n×nn\times n matrices whose jj -th column is zero is a left ideal but not a right ideal. - The ring C(R)C(\mathbb {R} ) of all continuous functions ff from R\mathbb {R} to R\mathbb {R} under pointwise multiplication contains the ideal of all continuous functions ff such that ⁠ f(1)=0f(1)=0 ⁠. Another ideal in C(R)C(\mathbb {R} ) is given by those functions that vanish for large enough arguments, i.e. those continuous functions ff for which there exists a number L>0L>0 such that f(x)=0f(x)=0 whenever ⁠ x>L\vert x\vert >L ⁠. - A ring is called a simple ring if it is nonzero and has no two-sided ideals other than ⁠ (0),(1)(0),(1) ⁠. Thus, a skew-field is simple and a simple commutative ring is a field. The matrix ring over a skew-field is a simple ring. - If f:RSf:R\to S is a ring homomorphism, then the kernel ker(f)=f1(0S)\ker(f)=f^{-1}(0_{S}) is a two-sided ideal of ⁠ RR ⁠. By definition, ⁠ f(1R)=1Sf(1_{R})=1_{S} ⁠, and thus if SS is not the zero ring (so ⁠ 1S0S1_{S}\neq 0_{S} ⁠), then ker(f)\ker(f) is a proper ideal. More generally, for each left ideal I of S, the pre-image f1(I)f^{-1}(I) is a left ideal. If I is a left ideal of R, then f(I)f(I) is a left ideal of the subring f(R)f(R) of S: unless f is surjective, f(I)f(I) need not be an ideal of S; see also § Extension and contraction of an ideal. - Ideal correspondence: Given a surjective ring homomorphism ⁠ f:RSf:R\to S ⁠, there is a bijective order-preserving correspondence between the left (resp. right, two-sided) ideals of RR containing the kernel of ff and the left (resp. right, two-sided) ideals of SS : the correspondence is given by If(I)I\mapsto f(I) and the pre-image ⁠ Jf1(J)J\mapsto f^{-1}(J) ⁠. Moreover, for commutative rings, this bijective correspondence restricts to prime ideals, maximal ideals, and radical ideals (see the Types of ideals section for the definitions of these ideals). - If M is a left R-module and SMS\subset M a subset, then the annihilator AnnR(S)={rRrs=0,sS}\operatorname {Ann} _{R}(S)=\{r\in R\mid rs=0,s\in S\} of S is a left ideal. Given ideals a,b{\mathfrak {a}},{\mathfrak {b}} of a commutative ring R, the R-annihilator of (b+a)/a({\mathfrak {b}}+{\mathfrak {a}})/{\mathfrak {a}} is an ideal of R called the ideal quotient of a{\mathfrak {a}} by b{\mathfrak {b}} and is denoted by ⁠ (a:b)({\mathfrak {a}}:{\mathfrak {b}}) ⁠; it is an instance of idealizer in commutative algebra. - Let ai,iS{\mathfrak {a}}_{i},i\in S be an ascending chain of left ideals in a ring R; i.e., SS is a totally ordered set and aiaj{\mathfrak {a}}_{i}\subset {\mathfrak {a}}_{j} for each ⁠ i<ji<j ⁠. Then the union iSai\textstyle \bigcup _{i\in S}{\mathfrak {a}}_{i} is a left ideal of R. (Note: this fact remains true even if R is without the unity 1.) - The above fact together with Zorn's lemma proves the following: if ERE\subset R is a possibly empty subset and a0R{\mathfrak {a}}_{0}\subset R is a left ideal that is disjoint from E, then there is an ideal that is maximal among the ideals containing a0{\mathfrak {a}}_{0} and disjoint from E. (Again this is still valid if the ring R lacks the unity 1.) When R0R\neq 0 , taking a0=(0){\mathfrak {a}}_{0}=(0) and ⁠ E={1}E=\{1\} ⁠, in particular, there exists a left ideal that is maximal among proper left ideals (often simply called a maximal left ideal); see Krull's theorem for more. - A left (resp. right, two-sided) ideal generated by a single element x is called the principal left (resp. right, two-sided) ideal generated by x and is denoted by RxRx (resp. ⁠ xR,RxRxR,RxR ⁠). The principal two-sided ideal RxRRxR is often also denoted by ⁠ (x)(x) ⁠ or x\langle x\rangle . - An arbitrary union of ideals need not be an ideal, but the following is still true: given a possibly empty subset X of R, there is the smallest left ideal containing X, called the left ideal generated by X and is denoted by ⁠ RXRX ⁠. Such an ideal exists since it is the intersection of all left ideals containing X. Equivalently, RXRX is the set of all the (finite) left R-linear combinations of elements of X over R: RX={r1x1++rnxnnN,riR,xiX}RX=\{r_{1}x_{1}+\dots +r_{n}x_{n}\mid n\in \mathbb {N} ,r_{i}\in R,x_{i}\in X\} (since such a span is the smallest left ideal containing X.) A right (resp. two-sided) ideal generated by X is defined in the similar way. For "two-sided", one has to use linear combinations from both sides; i.e., RXR={r1x1s1++rnxnsnnN,riR,siR,xiX}.RXR=\{r_{1}x_{1}s_{1}+\dots +r_{n}x_{n}s_{n}\mid n\in \mathbb {N} ,r_{i}\in R,s_{i}\in R,x_{i}\in X\}. If X={x1,,xn}X=\{x_{1},\dots ,x_{n}\} is a finite set, then RXRRXR is also written as ⁠ (x1,,xn)(x_{1},\dots ,x_{n}) ⁠ or x1,...,xn\langle x_{1},...,x_{n}\rangle . More generally, the two-sided ideal generated by a (finite or infinite) set of indexed ring elements X={xi}iIX=\{x_{i}\}_{i\in I} is denoted (X)=(xi)iI(X)=(x_{i})_{i\in I} or X=xiiI\langle X\rangle =\langle x_{i}\rangle _{i\in I} . - There is a bijective correspondence between ideals and congruence relations (equivalence relations that respect the ring structure) on the ring: Given an ideal II of a ring ⁠ RR ⁠, let xyx\sim y if ⁠ xyIx-y\in I ⁠. Then \sim is a congruence relation on ⁠ RR ⁠. Conversely, given a congruence relation \sim on ⁠ RR ⁠, let ⁠ I={xR:x0}I=\{x\in R:x\sim 0\} ⁠. Then II is an ideal of ⁠ RR ⁠. Cite error: There are tags on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist|group=note}} template (see the help page). - ^ ^{a}^{b}^{c}Dummit & Foote (2004), p. 243. - ^Lang (2005), Section III.2. - ^Dummit & Foote (2004), p. 244.
Advanced
Determines the rank of the group of units in the ring of integers of a number field.